文章摘要
刘勇,沈一吉,杨威,等.成对关联刺激对慢性意识障碍患者意识水平及神经功能的影响[J].中华物理医学与康复杂志,2026,48(7):612-617
成对关联刺激对慢性意识障碍患者意识水平及神经功能的影响
  
DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn421666-20251213-01105
中文关键词: 慢性意识障碍  成对关联刺激  经颅磁刺激  正中神经电刺激  意识恢复
英文关键词: Consciousness  Paired associative stimulation  Transcranial magnetic stimulation  Median nerve electrical stimulation  Consciousness recovery
基金项目:浙江省中医药科技计划(2023ZL238,2024ZL259);浙江省医药卫生科技项目(2023KY032,2023KY497,2024KY706,2024KY715)
作者单位
刘勇 浙江省人民医院(杭州医学院附属人民医院)康复医学科,浙江省康复中心,浙江省康复与运动医学研究所,杭州 310014 
沈一吉 浙江省人民医院(杭州医学院附属人民医院)康复医学科,浙江省康复中心,浙江省康复与运动医学研究所,杭州 310014 
杨威 浙江省人民医院(杭州医学院附属人民医院)康复医学科,浙江省康复中心,浙江省康复与运动医学研究所,杭州 310014 
钟树场 浙江省人民医院(杭州医学院附属人民医院)康复医学科,浙江省康复中心,浙江省康复与运动医学研究所,杭州 310014 
金振华 浙江省人民医院(杭州医学院附属人民医院)康复医学科,浙江省康复中心,浙江省康复与运动医学研究所,杭州 310014 
谭同才 浙江省人民医院(杭州医学院附属人民医院)康复医学科,浙江省康复中心,浙江省康复与运动医学研究所,杭州 310014 
摘要点击次数: 297
全文下载次数: 207
中文摘要:
  目的 探讨成对关联刺激(PAS)对慢性意识障碍(pDoC)患者意识水平及神经功能的影响。 方法 将80例pDoC患者按随机数字表法分为经颅磁刺激组(TMS组)、正中神经电刺激组(MNS组)、联合组和PAS组,每组20例。所有患者均接受标准化常规康复治疗,在此基础上,TMS组仅予以TMS干预,MNS组仅予以MNS干预,联合组予以TMS与MNS非时序联合治疗,PAS组予以基于时序配对的PAS治疗。治疗前及治疗4周后(治疗后),采用格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)、昏迷恢复量表修订版(CRS-R)和全面无反应性量表(FOUR)评估患者的意识状态,并检测体感诱发电位(SEP)及脑干听觉诱发电位(BAEP)。 结果 4组患者治疗后的GCS、CRS-R、FOUR评分,SEP的N20潜伏期与波幅,BAEP的Ⅰ、Ⅲ、Ⅴ波潜伏期及Ⅰ~Ⅲ、Ⅲ~Ⅴ波峰间潜伏期均较组内治疗前改善(P<0.05)。组间比较显示,PAS组上述指标的改善幅度均显著优于TMS组、MNS组及联合组(均P<0.05),联合组亦优于TMS组和MNS组(均P<0.05),TMS组与MNS组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗期间,所有患者均未发生严重不良反应。 结论 PAS能够有效提升pDoC患者的意识水平和神经功能,是一种安全性良好的促醒干预策略。
英文摘要:
    Objective To document any effects of paired associative stimulation (PAS) on the level of consciousness and neurological functioning of persons with prolonged disorders of consciousness (pDoC). Methods Eighty persons with prolonged consciousness disorders were randomly assigned (20 per group) to either a transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) group, a median nerve electrical stimulation (MNS) group, a combination group, or a PAS group. All received standard conventional rehabilitation. In addition, the TMS group received TMS alone, the MNS group received MNS alone, the combination group received non-sequential concurrent TMS and MNS, and the PAS group received MNS followed by TMS after a 25ms interval. Consciousness levels were assessed using the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), the revised Coma Recovery Scale (CRS-R), and the Full Outline of UnResponsiveness (FOUR) scale before and after 4 weeks of the interventions. Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) and brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEP) were also recorded. Results After the 4 weeks of treatment, all four groups showed significant improvements in their average GCS, CRS-R, and FOUR scores, as well as in SEP (N20 latency and amplitude) and BAEP (the latencies of waves I, III and V and interpeak latencies I-III, III-V). The PAS group exhibited significantly greater improvements in all of the outcome measurements compared with the other groups. The combined group significantly outperformed the TMS and MNS groups, while there was no significant difference between the TMS and MNS groups′ improvements. Conclusions PAS effectively enhances the level of consciousness and neurological functioning of persons with pDoC. It is a safe and promising neuromodulatory technique for promoting arousal.
查看全文   下载PDF阅读器  HTML全文
关闭